These labels were automatically added by AI and may be inaccurate. For details, see About Literature Database.
Abstract
The capabilities of large language models have grown significantly in recent
years and so too have concerns about their misuse. It is important to be able
to distinguish machine-generated text from human-authored content. Prior works
have proposed numerous schemes to watermark text, which would benefit from a
systematic evaluation framework. This work focuses on LLM output watermarking
techniques - as opposed to image or model watermarks - and proposes Mark My
Words, a comprehensive benchmark for them under different natural language
tasks. We focus on three main metrics: quality, size (i.e., the number of
tokens needed to detect a watermark), and tamper resistance (i.e., the ability
to detect a watermark after perturbing marked text). Current watermarking
techniques are nearly practical enough for real-world use: Kirchenbauer et al.
[33]'s scheme can watermark models like Llama 2 7B-chat or Mistral-7B-Instruct
with no perceivable loss in quality on natural language tasks, the watermark
can be detected with fewer than 100 tokens, and their scheme offers good tamper
resistance to simple perturbations. However, they struggle to efficiently
watermark code generations. We publicly release our benchmark
(https://github.com/wagner-group/MarkMyWords).